Classic P2P
Best for verified users who are comfortable trading directly with another user while Qipora provides structure, payment references, proof flow, and dispute support.
Qipora separates buyer payable, seller net amount, and platform revenue so users can understand what they pay and receive.
Qipora supports both direct P2P trading and stronger controlled settlement. The right choice depends on trade value, user trust, and how much operational protection the parties want.
Best for verified users who are comfortable trading directly with another user while Qipora provides structure, payment references, proof flow, and dispute support.
Best for users who want stronger settlement control, reconciliation visibility, audit trail, admin oversight, and controlled release safeguards.
| Area | Classic P2P | Custodial P2P |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Direct trades between comfortable verified users. | Trades needing stronger control and confidence. |
| Control level | Structured workflow and dispute path. | Custody controls, reconciliation, and release safeguards. |
| Trust value | Good for simple cases. | Stronger for new users, larger trades, or sensitive payments. |
The buyer pays the trade amount plus the Qipora fee while the seller receives the trade amount.
The buyer pays the trade amount while the seller receives the trade amount less the fee.
The fee can be split between buyer payable and seller net sides.