Classic P2P
Best for verified users who are comfortable trading directly with another user while Qipora provides structure, payment references, proof flow, and dispute support.
Security is handled through account controls, admin-only tools, protected webhook configuration, release flags, and audit logs for sensitive decisions.
Qipora supports both direct P2P trading and stronger controlled settlement. The right choice depends on trade value, user trust, and how much operational protection the parties want.
Best for verified users who are comfortable trading directly with another user while Qipora provides structure, payment references, proof flow, and dispute support.
Best for users who want stronger settlement control, reconciliation visibility, audit trail, admin oversight, and controlled release safeguards.
| Area | Classic P2P | Custodial P2P |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Direct trades between comfortable verified users. | Trades needing stronger control and confidence. |
| Control level | Structured workflow and dispute path. | Custody controls, reconciliation, and release safeguards. |
| Trust value | Good for simple cases. | Stronger for new users, larger trades, or sensitive payments. |
Admin and trading features require authentication and appropriate user status.
Custody release remains protected by operational controls and safety flags.
Legacy unsigned webhook behavior remains disabled.